Here are my principal conclusions:— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
1. Attorney General Barr has deliberately misrepresented Mueller’s report.
2. President Trump has engaged in impeachable conduct.
3. Partisanship has eroded our system of checks and balances.
4. Few members of Congress have read the report.
I offer these conclusions only after having read Mueller’s redacted report carefully and completely, having read or watched pertinent statements and testimony, and having discussed this matter with my staff, who thoroughly reviewed materials and provided me with further analysis.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
In comparing Barr’s principal conclusions, congressional testimony, and other statements to Mueller’s report, it is clear that Barr intended to mislead the public about Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s analysis and findings.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
Barr’s misrepresentations are significant but often subtle, frequently taking the form of sleight-of-hand qualifications or logical fallacies, which he hopes people will not notice.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
Under our Constitution, the president “shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” While “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” is not defined, the context implies conduct that violates the public trust.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
Contrary to Barr’s portrayal, Mueller’s report reveals that President Trump engaged in specific actions and a pattern of behavior that meet the threshold for impeachment.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
In fact, Mueller’s report identifies multiple examples of conduct satisfying all the elements of obstruction of justice, and undoubtedly any person who is not the president of the United States would be indicted based on such evidence.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
Impeachment, which is a special form of indictment, does not even require probable cause that a crime (e.g., obstruction of justice) has been committed; it simply requires a finding that an official has engaged in careless, abusive, corrupt, or otherwise dishonorable conduct.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
While impeachment should be undertaken only in extraordinary circumstances, the risk we face in an environment of extreme partisanship is not that Congress will employ it as a remedy too often but rather that Congress will employ it so rarely that it cannot deter misconduct.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
Our system of checks and balances relies on each branch’s jealously guarding its powers and upholding its duties under our Constitution. When loyalty to a political party or to an individual trumps loyalty to the Constitution, the Rule of Law—the foundation of liberty—crumbles.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
We’ve witnessed members of Congress from both parties shift their views 180 degrees—on the importance of character, on the principles of obstruction of justice—depending on whether they’re discussing Bill Clinton or Donald Trump.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
Few members of Congress even read Mueller’s report; their minds were made up based on partisan affiliation—and it showed, with representatives and senators from both parties issuing definitive statements on the 448-page report’s conclusions within just hours of its release.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
America’s institutions depend on officials to uphold both the rules and spirit of our constitutional system even when to do so is personally inconvenient or yields a politically unfavorable outcome. Our Constitution is brilliant and awesome; it deserves a government to match it.— Justin Amash (@justinamash) May 18, 2019
Many on Twitter are grateful to read a refreshingly honest stance from a Republican Congressmen.
Thank you, @justinamash for: 1) representing actual conservativism; 2) for reading the report (especially when so many who have the responsibility to do so haven't) and 3) for providing your conclusions.— Spring Lambs (@GretchenlbB) May 18, 2019
It took longer than we expected, but you delivered on your promise.
You touched my heart with your honesty and I have a few tears too. Thank you from the bottom of my heart.— Judy (@JWV52) May 18, 2019
Thank you, sir, for this courageous thread. I hope that other politicians, from both parties, will take the time to consider the facts and their responsibilities as public servants and seek an objective, apolitical set of conclusions and take action as the Constitution requires.— Bob Tate (@btate2010) May 18, 2019
Thank you for your honesty with this. I don’t know another republican congressman or senator that has been this honest. Now please work to convince your fellow republicans and work with the democrats to right these wrongs.— Cindy Wise (@WiseguyC) May 18, 2019
Regardless of whether folks agree with your or not, I'm a fan of your integrity and commitment to transparency. I feel like I can trust you to say what you believe and explain your beliefs in public. I wish more reps did that— Greg Ferenstein (@ferenstein) May 18, 2019
Thank you. Refreshing to see at least one Republican exhibit principles.— 5thGenTexasProgFan (@5thGenSnowflake) May 18, 2019
I actually greatly appreciate your sharing this. The problem is that I don't trust that you or your GOP colleagues will respond with much more than furrowed brows and statements that you are "terribly troubled" about it all.— Alissa McLean (@alissakmclean) May 18, 2019
In recent days there has only been a handful of decent, real conservatives left in the Republican party and of those few people most all have eventually caved into the pressures of Trumpism. It’s nice to see that Justin Amash, at least on Twitter, understands the reality of what’s really going on away from the chaos and noise of the Trump echo chambers.
It’s nice to read but I remain skeptical. People like Senators Ben Sasse, Mike Lee, and Rand Paul, at one point were also principled conservatives, but just as I witnessed them making public statements about honesty and integrity, their votes often told a different story. They are now firmly in the Trump camp defending the indefensible. Like many others before them it’s far easier to talk the talk than to walk the walk.